Monday 28 January 2013

Madame Bovary

Author: Gustave Flaubert
Genre: Classic, Realism
Rating: B+

I wasn't a huge fan of Madam Bovary, for a number of reasons.  While I realize that it's classic literature and it's really well written, I found I really struggled in reading this novel.  On the one hand, I found a good chunk of it to be a bit boring - it's full of really elegant passages and there are moments that are really exciting, but for the most part it's all a bit dull and nothing seems to really happen.  I mean, yes, stuff happens, and yes there is this arch, but a lot of the time instead of showing me what's happening Flaubert instead simply tells me what's happened 

Madam Bovary follows the life of one Charles Bovary and his second wife, the young Emma.  Charles is a not too bright doctor in a provincial town of France who is madly in love with the idea of his wife and extremely devoted to her.  Emma is... well, Emma is basically a bitch who's read too much and as such has developed an idea of what love should be - and it's not what she has with her husband.  Love in her mind is only what it depicted in books and is full of grand gestures and what not. So, eventually, she decides to embark on an affair - and eventually her actions lead to ruin for all.

So, yeah.  Emma is not likeable. Charles is not likeable.  While you might feel bad for them both at various points in the novel - particularly in the end - you don't actually ever like them or even root for them.  The situation that they get themselves into is of their own doing and simply because they're both improperly educated (and aspiring to rise above their station in life, which was a no-no at the time), and because they don't communicate - also a no-no at the time.

The one thing that I did like about this book was the commentary that it makes on French life and French people.  I also enjoyed the commentary that it makes about relationships in general - one issue that was pointed out to me is just how the theme of communication is one that has come up time and time again in fiction surrounding relationships.  If people communicated better within Madam Bovary then the story would have a very different ending.  And maybe the characters would have been likeable.  That's actually the thing about this - there's no one here who I felt I should be rooting for.  I liked some of the more side characters, at least at times, but for the most part everyone sucked.  Except Justin, Justin was kind of great, but you knew he wasn't going to do well through the course of the novel - at least not until he escaped from everyone.

Sunday 27 January 2013

Week in Review: January 21 - 26

Movies - Best movie of the week was indie comedy Sleepwalk with Me, which I loved.  New movie of the week was Gangster Squad and rounding things out was Goon.  Both were good, but neither was amazing.

Books - Book of the week was Crown and Country by David Starkey.  I really enjoyed this, despite a few problems with it overall.

TV - TV show of the week was the second season of Project Runway: All Stars.  I like the overall concept of All Stars in general, but I'm not sure if I'm too much of a fan of the way Project Runway does it - they've changed too much in changing the hosts and judges.

Recommendations - The big movie that I'm looking forward to seeing out this week is Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters.  Everything else is just kind of "oh, hey, there's that."

Next Week - New movie next week will be Broken City.  We'll see about the rest of the week; I've got the computer problems worked out, so I'll be around.

Requests - Anything I should do? Let me know.

Saturday 26 January 2013

Project Runway: All Stars (Season 2)

Creator: Eli Holzman
Genre: Reality, Competition, Fashion
Rating: B-

I have to confess that while I do really enjoy Project Runway, I have more mixed feelings regarding Project Runway: All Stars.  While I still like the contestants - although I do kind of question just how some of them made it onto Project Runway in the first place let alone the All Stars installment - I really miss the chore people of the original series - Heidi Klum, Tim Gunn, Michael Kors, and Nina Garcia.  Nothing against the people that they bring in for the All Stars, but we just don't love them as much.

Season 2 of All Stars features cast members from every season of Project Runway up to season 9, with the exception of season 4.  What I did like about this is that they had four runner ups this season, although they also had people who came in 10th and 11th on their original season, which contributes to some of the begging the question as to how some of these people are All Stars.  Despite that, though, as the season progressed I really started to like all of the remaining contestants.  I didn't know all, or really most, of them from their original season, but once the weaker designers were weeded out I really came to enjoy most of them and their esthetic.

I have kind of mixed feelings about the finale.  I really liked two of the designers who made it to the final three, but I wasn't really a fan of the third designer.  In the end, while I did like the person who won, it wasn't necessarily the person who I wanted to win.  I also kind of questioned the way they rated the first and second runner up, as I really thought that the person who came in third probably should have won, and the person who won should have come in second.

I did like the overall challenges of this season, with my favourites being the avant-garde androgynous look and the graffiti art challenges.  I was a bit disappointed by the overall celebrity judges.  There were a couple that I thought were great, but overall it seemed a bit subpar for the series.  A bit of a disappointment, really.

Friday 25 January 2013

Recommendations: January 25

Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters - The latest from Jeremy Renner, I really, really want to see this movie.  I like the new take on the fairy tale genre, with the badassery, so I'm looking forward to this one.

Movie 43 - This is a series of interconnected shorts based on the idea of three kids browsing through the internet in the search of the most banned movie in the world.  It sounds a lot like New York, I Love You or the director version of New Years Eve.

John Dies at the End - This one's getting a limited release so it'll probably be a challenge to find. However, based on the book of the same name, it follows two college dropouts as they try to save the world from an otherworldy invasion.

End of Watch - I really enjoyed this movie, and really recommend checking it out.  It was a lot better than I expected it to be, simply because it didn't go in the direction that I expected it to.

The Paperboy - This is the movie that's kind of surprised me this year.  I haven't seen it yet, but the response that it got really surprised me.  It's gotten rather mixed reviews, but it's also been nominated for more than a few awards.

The Perks of Being a Wallflower - I love, love, love, loved this movie.  If you haven't seen it yet, see it now. If you've already seen it, then hey, see it again.

Ysabel - this is an urban fantasy novel by Canadian author Guy Gavriel Kay.  If you haven't read any of Kay's work, then the best reasoning I have for why you should read Ysabel or anything else by him is that when Christopher Tolkien was editing the unpublished work his father, J.R.R. Tolkien, had left behind, it was Kay who helped.  This man literally learned to write by editing the works of Tolkien, so if you're a fantasy fan he should be right up your alley.

Thursday 24 January 2013

Sleepwalk with Me (2012)

Director: Mike Birbiglia
Genre: Comedy
Rating: A

"And that's what love is. It's this giant mound of pizza-flavoured ice cream and delusion."

I came across this movie by accident.  Actually, I came across this movie through Joss Whedon: he told me not to see it.  Except, the way he did it was the same tongue-in-cheek way that he told me to vote for Mitt Romney because he would create the perfect setting for a zombie apocalypse, so I took it as a sign that I should watch Sleepwalk with Me.  All I can say having watched it is that I'm really glad Joss Whedon told me not to.
Sleepwalk with Me follows aspiring comedian Matt Pandamiglio (Birbiglia) as he comes to terms with a series of denials: his girlfriend, his career, and his sleep disorder.  He's been with girlfriend Abby (Ambrose) for eight years now and things seem to be moving in the direction of marriage - but Matt isn't too sure about it, considering marriage to be something that should only be done when he's certain that nothing else good will happen in his life.  His career is going nowhere; while he calls himself a comedian he actually works as a bartender and has yet to accept the fact that his jokes really aren't funny.  And underneath it all is his sleep disorder; for reasons that he doesn't understand he's taken to acting out his dreams while still asleep.

The whole thing is based on Birbiglia's actual life, his rise to fame, his relationship problems, his sleep disorder.  While the names, places, etc, have been changed, the actual story is his story.  Instantly that makes it all so much more real, and when Matt tells you in the opening that he's going to tell you a story and it's real, he's being serious.  As such, the drama of the film is so much more real.  The fights feel real, the problems, etc.  The struggles of Matt and Abby and the fact that they're together when it's questionable whether or not they should be - and all the time hoping that Matt gets his shit together while also realizing that in reality, people don't always do that.  Life doesn't fit into the perfectly timed operations of a script, and that's what makes Sleepwalk with Me work.

This is a movie that's rather subtly funny.  I didn't really laugh out loud a lot, at least not until Matt's comedy started getting better, but I still enjoyed the humour to it. It was more one of those smile as you watch it and think about what's going on type of comedy than an actual laugh out loud type.  Even though it's actually billed as a comedy I found it to be a lot more of a drama, which worked for me - I tend to prefer dramas to comedies in general.  I also want to make note of the acting.  I love Lauren Ambrose and have since she was in Six Feet Under.  I think she's a great actress and I love how she totally sold me on why Abby was with Matt.  I also really liked Mike Birbiglia's performance.  I haven't seen him in anything before, not even his comedy, although I now want to see more of him.  I also totally want to give him props for the direction that he took this film in. He wrote it, he directed it, and he starred in it, and it all really worked.  So, yeah.  Unlike Joss Whedon, I'm not going to sarcastically tell you to boycott this film.  Instead I'm going to unsarcastically tell you to see this movie.  It's great and definitely worth your time.

Wednesday 23 January 2013

Gangster Squad (2013)

Director: Ruben Fleischer
Genre: Action, Crime, Drama
Rating: C+

I'm going to predicate this by saying that while I'm not exactly giving this a good review, I did enjoy it.  Gangster Squad was definitely over hyped and possibly even wrongly promoted, and as such going into it I was expecting one type of movie and got something a bit different.  This is a movie created by the guy who did Zombieland, and as such it's a movie like Zombieland kind of trying to be a movie like Godfather or something similar.  As such, it kind of ends up in between the two, to the detriment of the film, although throughout it it still manages to be entertaining and fun.

Gangster Squad is the kind of true, but not really, story of Mickey Cohen (Penn) and the police officers who formed a squad, the Gangster Squad, to stop him.  The head of this squad is Sergeant John O'Mara (Brolin), a decorated war hero who doesn't fit into the L.A. police scene simply because he won't take bribes and wants to persecute Cohen and his thugs.  O'Mara is joined by detective Coleman Harris (Mackie), wire-tapper Conway Keeler (Ribisi), gunslinger Max Kennard (Patrick), and his partner Navidad Ramirez (Peña).  His friend, Jerry Wooters (Gosling), who has rejected an offer to join the squad, meanwhile is carrying on an affair with Cohen's lover, Grace Faraday (Stone).

Okay, so let's see.  The action was fun, I enjoyed it.  With the exception of the Chinatown incident it all really flowed well and was, while not exactly believable, definitely entertaining.  There were a few moments that were a bit hockey, and a few add ins that made me feel like the film was trying to be the 1960s Batman - more than once I almost expected a "POW" to be displayed across the screen - but for the most part it was fun.  The humour was good too and really on key.  It wasn't an overly funny movie, but there were definitely a number of points when someone would say something that made me smile or chuckle a little.

I really liked the relationship between O'Mara and his wife, played by Mireille Enos, and really wanted more of it.  From the get go I felt the love and chemistry between the two of them and I worried about what was going to happen to each of them, and between each of them, more than any other character.  Actually, with all honesty, the only other characters that I really cared about here were the ones played by Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone - although more because I like the actors themselves than because of any development of their relationship.  I do think that Gosling's Jerry was developed, and I really enjoyed the character, but Stone's Grace was less developed, and their relationship... somehow, despite the fact that I already know the two as a couple from Crazy, Stupid, Love and know that they can have amazing chemistry, the two don't really have chemistry here.  It's lacking, which sucks.  I want to see more from the two of them as a couple in this film so that I could really love them as a couple.  And now I just want to go watch Crazy, Stupid, Love again.  I will stick this out there, though, if you're filming a movie with Ryan Gosling and Sean Penn in it one of them should appear shirtless and the other should not.  I'm sorry, Gangster Squad, but you made the wrong decision there.

Tuesday 22 January 2013

Goon (2011)

Director: Michael Dowse
Genre: Comedy
Rating: C+

So, in celebration of the NHL Lockout coming to an end and hockey being back, I've decided to review the hockey film Goon.  Inspired by the biography Goon: The True Story of an Unlikely Journey into Minor League Hockey by Adam Frattasio and Doug Smith, Goon follows Jewish dimwit Doug Glatt (Scott) in his rather accidental journey into minor league hockey.  Doug is the son of a stereotypical Jewish doctor who's long felt a bit ostracized in his family owing to the fact that he's not nearly as smart as his father (Eugene Levy) or brother (David Paetkau) - his brother, Ira, is also a doctor, and a gay one at that.  One day, Doug goes to a minor league hockey game with his friend, Pat (Baruchel), where he gets into a fight with one of the players who uses the word "fag."  This fight inspires the coach of Doug's home team to recruit him as an enforcer.  From there, Doug is called up to Canada to play for the Halifax Highlanders.  The Highlanders have a problem with their best player, Xavier Lalfamme (Marc-André Grondin); three years prior he was concussed by Ross "The Boss" Rhea (Schreiber).  Laflamme is now scared of being hit again, and is struggling, while Rhea has been demoted to the Minors again and is looking to go out with a bang. Oh! And there's a girl, Eva (Pill), who is a real puck bunny, who's charmed by Doug even though she has a boyfriend.

Um... okay, so this movie is kind of filled with stereotypes and archetypical characters.  No one seems to be really all that well developed and things tend to fall on the basic path of "good," "bad" or "good but in need of redemption" that one typically expects in a movie like this.  It's a fun movie, but there's no real depth to it, which is in itself a bit disappointing.  I also kind of found that there was no real suspense to it.  It doesn't take a genius to figure out the direction that the film is going in, or what the end result will be.  It's not hard to figure out.

That said, it is fun. In a way, it kind of reminds me of the old Slap Shot movies, just with a new cast.  It's pretty much everything you expect from a movie about hockey starring Seann William Scott.  I donno, I'm not sure what more to say.  It wasn't great, but it was good.

Monday 21 January 2013

Crown and Country

Author: David Starkey
Genre: Non-Fiction, Historical
Rating: A-

This book could be divided into three parts, beginning, middle, and end, each part which is rather different and each part which I have different feelings about.  Throughout it, historian David Starkey describes the rise and falls (and there are many, many falls) of the men and women who have served as monarch of the nation that is now known as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.  Covering literally two thousand years of history Starkey traces the history of the monarchy, and the history of the nation itself, from its inception in the Celtic British period to the modern day Windsors.

The beginning part of this story, in my opinion, is the period of Britons, Anglo-Saxons, and Danes, ending with the death of Harold Godwinson and the Norman invasion.  William the Conqueror starts the middle section, and it continues on through the Normans, into the Plantagenets, and its cadet branches the Lancasters and Yorks, and ending with the rise of the House of Tudor.  The final part starts with the children of Henry VIII, Edward, Mary, and Elizabeth, and the Nine Days Queen, Jane, and continues through the Stuarts, Hanovers, the short-lived Saxe-Coburg and Gothas, and the current Windsors.  While each part is in itself extremely interesting and well linked - both with the contents of itself, and with the overall arch of the story it's telling - the way they're handled is somewhat different.  You can tell that Starkey prefers what I'm calling his middle part to the other points in British history, simply by the amount of detail that he uses when discussing the Normans, Plantagenets, and the first Tudors.  The bulk of the book is in itself a glance at the Kings and Queens of Britain and the making of the monarchy, but somehow it feels as though there is more detail to the stories of some of the earlier monarchs than there is in the later monarchs, or at least more of an attempt.  Obviously there is considerably less in regards to the Britons or the early Anglo-Saxons, who existed in a largely unrecorded period, but following the rise of Wessex and the subsequent rise of the Normans the amount of detail grows and it feels as though Starkey is really interested in what he's writing about.  Then, suddenly the amount of detail begins to drop and his interest appears to wane.

This can be seen just through the division of the chapters.  No monarch gets their own chapter in "Part I  - Beginnings," although for a good portion of this section the reigns are short and factual knowledge is limited - and it should be noted Edward the Confessor and Harold Godwinson, the latter whom had a very short reign, don't share their chapter with any earlier monarchs.  Each of the Norman kings gets his own chapter, as do the early Plantagenet kings - yes, Stephen and Matilda share one, but in a way they also share a reign.  Things move quicker with the later Plantagenets, particularly as the War of the Roses comes into force, but once again this kind of makes sense - the Richards, Henrys, and Edwards all kind of go together in terms of their historical greatness.  Where Starkey kind of loses me, however, is in giving Henry VIII his own chapter (deserving), but then dividing the reign of Elizabeth I into two, to be shared in a chapter with her siblings (no special chapter header for Jane Grey) first, and a shared chapter with her successor James VI & I and his son Charles I.  The reign of Elizabeth I is kind of a big deal - so big, in fact, that the era was named after it.  It is one of those reigns that kind of deserves its own chapter.  Likewise, Victoria deserves her own chapter, if only because of the length of her reign.  Dividing into two and wedging it into chapters that deal first with her uncles, George IV and William IV, and then with her son, grandson, and great-grandsons, in order Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII, and George VI, does not do her justice.

Nor, for that matter, does the whole way that he treats the 20th century (or several other centuries for that matter).  The closer to the present day the more the the reigns seem to be a bit squished together, the more the story becomes rather rushed.  Events like the two World Wars, the Jacobite Risings, Napoleon, the Abdication Crisis, etc, are all kind of glanced over.  There's also the idea of the Hanoverian monarchs having poor relationships with their parents, or conversely their eldest children. While Starkey touches on it he seems to be unaware of it at times - even going so far as to inaccurately say that the relationship between Prince Philip and Prince Charles shows the resumption of this Hanover tradition for the first time in three generations - it's not, not at all.  While there was a good relationship between George VI and Elizabeth II, the relationship between brothers Edward VIII and George VI with their father, George V, was at best less than stellar.  Likewise, while the relationship between George V and his father, Edward VII, was great, he was the younger brother, his elder brother, Prince Albert Victor, having had a very bad relationship with the King.  This trend continues too; Edward VII and his father, Prince Albert; Victoria and her mother the Duchess of Kent; George IV and George III; George II and George I... it continues.

The one thing that I really want to give Starkey credit for is the fact that while this book is very much historical, Starkey uses a narrative approach to make it interesting and appealing.  It was really great.  I also really enjoyed how he addressed and made reference to the different myths and legends that have been attached to the monarchs he's discussing, like the means of the death of Edward II.  I actually kind of want to re-read this book just so that I can take note of every time homosexuality, homoeroticism, etc, comes up.  It's actually a lot more than one might expect.  I also wouldn't mind re-reading to take extra note of ever usurping, rebellion, revolt, civil war, revolution, etc.  It's actually a lot more than one would think - in all honesty, going into this, I knew of the Norman Conquest, the struggles between Stephen and Matilda, the back-and-forth between Henry VI and Edward IV, and the subsequent usurpers Richard III and Henry VII, the Civil War and rise of Cromwell, and then of course the banishing of James II.  In a lot of ways, though, that's only the tip of the iceberg; there's so much more to it all.

Sunday 20 January 2013

Week in Review: January 14 - 19

Awards - With the mentality of better late than never, I did up a thing on the nominations for this year's Golden Raspberry Awards, my favourite awards of the season.  Also up were the results of the 70th Golden Globes, and a bit of a commentary on the presentation itself.

Birthdays -  Two birthday's this week, Betty White's 91st, and A.A. Milne's 131st.

Movies - While I said last week that I would be doing Gangster Squad this week I clearly lied.  Instead new movie of the week was Jack Reacher, which I thoroughly enjoyed.  Other movies of the week were the 1984 Red Dawn and The Bang Bang Club, neither of which was all that good.

Books - Book of the week was Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, which is probably my favourite instalment in the series.

TV - TV show of the week was the first season of the original series of Star Trek.  I've had some computer problems, so the review was initially posted uncompleted; that's been corrected now.

Recommendations - The movie out this week that I'm most looking forward to is Broken City. While I made other recommendations, nothing else overly caught my attention and I doubt I'll see them in theatres.

Next Week - I'm not too sure about next week, owing to the computer problems.  I'm definitely going to do Gangster Squad, and I'll do the weekly recommendations, but the rest of the week is up in the air.

Requests -What about you? Anything I should read or see? Let me know!

Saturday 19 January 2013

Star Trek: The Original Series (Season 1)

Courtesy of Wikipedia
Genre: Sci-Fi
Rating: C+

This is going to be a bit sacrelige, but I didn't really enjoy the first season of Star Trek: The Original Series (initially known  as simply Star Trek).  There was a plethora of reasons, but the biggest were simply the overall writing, the horrible special effects, the overall plot (or lack thereof), and the acting.

For those who don't know Star Trek (are in the dark so to speak, probably owing to the rock on the far side of Pluto that they've been living on for the past forty or so years), the original series follows the crew of the starship USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) as they "boldly go where no man has gone before."  The crew is headed by Captain James T. Kirk (Shatner), first officer Spock (Nimoy), and chief medical officer Leonard "Bones" McCoy (Kelley), and rounded out by crew members chief engineer Montgomery "Scotty" Scott (Doohan), communications officer Uhura (Nichols), helmsman Sulu (Takei), yoeman Janice Rand (Whitney), and nurse Christine Chapel (Barett).  In the first series, the crew encounter aliens, defy death (except for when they don't), deal with mutants, and watch as Kirk loses his shirt and sleeps his way through the galaxy.

I don't actually mind the general plot of the story, as it's really rather typical of science fiction (especially of science fiction of this time), and I can appreciate the ways in which it helped the genre.  I'm not a big fan of the writing though, simply because I found myself having to buy into a bit too much.  This probably could have been avoided had the show been less episodic and more serial; each episode essentially carried itself and was unaffected by the episodes that came before it - and thus had no effect on the episodes that came after it.  I'm not a fan of TV tabula rasa, which in my opinion is essentially what happens here.  Every episode the Enterprise crew come up against some new adventure, Kirk sleeps with some new woman, and people (often in red shirts) die.  Every episode the crew learns something - only to conveniently forget it by the next episode.  It is because of this that the show is able to be aired in a non-chronological order, which goes contrary to the order in which they were produced in.

The problem of the special effects is one that can be dismissed by the fact that Star Trek was created in the mid-1960s, until you realize that Planet of the Apes was created around the same time.  Some of the effects are actually pretty cool and I have to admit that I love the backgrounds that fill the show.  What I hate, however, are the aliens.  They're really kind of lame, and often really cheesy.  The worst, in my opinion, is the neural parasites in the season finale, which were literally created by covering novelty vomit in a plastic bladder.  Seriously: the special effects involved dollar store fake vomit.

The worst thing, though, is the acting.  While there are some good, possibly even great actors, here - I really have to say that I love Leonard Nimoy's Spock - most of them are a bit more on the mediocre side of things, and William Shatner... William Shatner is not a good actor.  He's entertaining, yes, but he's not exactly good.  The fact that he's the lead here just makes things worse, as does his manner of enunciating every word and thus making them into their own individual sentence. While I suspect that this is done so as to add emphasis and create dramatic tension, what it actually does is makes him sound as though he's constantly struggling to remember his lines.

Friday 18 January 2013

33rd Golden Raspberry Awards: Nominations

So, I'm a bit late on this one, but the 33rd Golden Raspberry Awards nominations were announced last week. These ones are always my favourite nominations, just because they look at what was the worst things to come out of the previous year.  What's not fun about that?

I'm not going to make any predictions here, but I am going to note which movies I have seen, in bold, and which ones I, for some ridiculous reason, want to see, underlined.

Please, don't judge me.
Worst Picture Worst Actor
Worst Actress
  •  Battleship
  • The Oogieloves in the Big Balloon Adventure
  •  That's My Boy
  • A Thousand Words
  • The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Nicholas Cage in Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence
  • Eddie Murphy in  A Thousand Words
  • Robert Pattinson in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Tyler Perry in Alex Cross and Good Deeds
  • Adam Sandler in That's My Boy
  •  Katherine Heigl in One for the Money
  • Milla Jovovich in Resident Evil: Retribution
  • Tyler Perry in Tyler Perry's Madea's Witness Protection
  • Kristen Stewart in Snow White and the Huntsman and The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Barbra Streisand in The Guilt Trip
Worst Supporting Actor
Worst Supporting Actress Worst Screen Couple
  •  Taylor Lautner in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Liam Neeson in Battleship and  Wrath of the Titans
  • Nick Swardson in That's My Boy
  • Vanilla Ice in That's My Boy
  • Jessica Biel in Playing for Keeps and Total Recall
  • Brooklyn Decker in Battleship and What to Expect When You're Expecting
  • Ashley Greene in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Jennifer Lopez in What to Expect When You're Expecting 
  • Rhianna in Battleship
  •  Any two cast members from Jersey Shore in The Three Stooges
  • Mackenzie Foy and Taylor Lautner in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Tyler Perry and his Drag Get Up in Tyler Perry's Madea's Witness Protection
  • Adam Sandler and either Leighton Meester, Andy Samberg, or Susan Sarandon in That's My Boy
Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off, or Sequel Worst Director Worst Screenplay
  •  Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence
  • Tyler Perry's Madea's Witness Protection
  • Piranha 3DD
  •  Red Dawn
  • The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 
  • Sean Anders, That's My Boy
  • Peter Berg, Battleship
  • Bill Condon, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
  • Tyler Perry, Good Deeds and Tyler Perry's Madea's Witness Protection
  • John Putch, Atlas Shrugged: Part II
  • Battleship
  • That's My Boy
  • A Thousand Words
  • The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2

Worst Screen Ensemble
 
  • The cast of Battleship
  • The cast of Tyler Perry's Madea's Witness Protection
  • The cast of The Oogieloves in the Big Balloon Adventure
  • The cast of That's My Boy
  • The cast of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2

Birthday: A.A. Milne

Today is, or would have been, the 131st birthday of author A.A. Milne.

If you don't know who A.A. Milne is, then I feel for you and am questioning what kind of childhood you had.

Milne wrote extensively throughout his life, publishing his first work in 1903 at the age of 21.  Milne wrote extensively for the magazine Punch, while also writing short stories, novels, poems, and plays.  He wrote in many different genres, for both adults and children, and was kind of rather awesome.  What he is most known for, however, is his Winnie the Pooh stories.  As the story goes, Milne's son, Christopher Robin Milne, had a collection of stuffed animals, one a bear named Edward.  Then one day Milne and his son went to the London Zoo where they saw a Canadian black bear named Winnie, which Christopher Robin renamed his bear after.  Milne then began to write stories about the adventures of Christopher Robin, Winnie-the-Pooh, and Christopher Robin's other toys, Piglet, Eeyore, Kanga, Roo, Owl, Rabbit, and Tigger.

And so, despite the fact that he's been dead for 57 years, and Christopher Robin for 17, today is A.A. Milne's birthday, and he would have been 131.

Recommendations: January 18

Mama - Okay, so I'm going to guarantee that I won't see this one - I don't like horror movies  But, based on the cast I'll also say that it's probably worth checking out if you do like them.  This one stars Jessica Chastain and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, who are both great actors.

The Last Stand - It's Arnold.  What can I say?

Broken City - A new cop-involved-in-bad-shit movie, starring Mark Wahlberg, Russell Crowe, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Kyle Chandler.  Despite the over use of this genre, I like everyone who's in it and I'll see it for that alone.

Taken 2 - The sequel to the 2008 film, Taken, in which Liam Neeson plays a man who, along with his wife, is taken hostage by the idiot who didn't learn that taking things Liam Neeson loves hostage is a bad idea in the first film.  I haven't seen either, but hey Liam Neeson!

To Rome With Love - The latest from Woody Allen.  If you like Woody Allen, why not check this one out?

Won't Back Down - The latest movie about people trying to save the school system, this one starring Maggie Gyllenhaal and Viola Davis.  This is kind of a genre that I love, so I'm really looking forward to seeing it.

Farewell, My Queen - A foreign film about Marie Antoinette in the first days of the French Revolution, this film looks really good.  Plus it stars Diane Kruger, so yeah. There's that.

An Irish Country Doctor - I stumbled across the Irish Country series by Patrick Taylor rather by accident - the book cover caught my attention when I was browsing through the bookstore.  I'm really glad that I did, because these books are great.  Set in 1964 in Ulster, Ireland, An Irish Country Doctor follows new doctor Barry Laverty as he takes on an apprenticeship under Doctor Fingal Flahertie O'Reilly in the village of Ballybucklebo.

Thursday 17 January 2013

Birthday: Betty White

Today is the 91st birthday of actress, comedian, singer, author, television personality, and, since 2010, soul surviving Golden Girl, Betty White.

White has had an active career since 1939, when she entered into show business by appearing in radio shows.  She soon got her own radio show, The Betty White Show, before entering into television.  In 1950 she received her first Emmy nomination, for Best Actress in the first year that the category was made.  White went on to appear in the comedy shows Life with Elizabeth, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, The Love Boat, Mama's Family, The Golden Girls, The Golden Palace, Boston Legal, The Bold and the Beautiful, and most recently Hot in Cleveland.  She was also the hostess of NBC's annual Tournament of Roses Parade, then CBC's Macy's Thanksgiving Parade, and now hosts Betty White's Off Their Rockers.  Oh, and for many years she made regular appearances on game shows like Password and Match Game, the former which was hosted by her third husband Allen Ludden.  In her lengthy career, White has received 21 Emmy nominations, won seven Emmy Awards, won one Grammy, and in 1995 was awarded a Star on the Walk of Fame.

Yeah, and she's 91.  Happy birthday!

Red Dawn (1984)

Director: John Milius
Genre: Action, Adventure, Drama, War
Rating: C

This is not a good movie.  I'm just going to stick that out there: Red Dawn is not good.  At best it's a very conservative, rather violent movie about a situation that is really hard to buy into.  When the premise of your movie is that the United States is caught unaware by a Soviet invasion and the only people who fight back (at least for a good chunk of it) are a group of teenagers in Colorado, I kind of have a hard time buying into it.

So, yeah.  At some point in the 1980s the USA becomes increasingly isolated when several European nations, all of them except for the UK, withdraw from NATO, at a time when the Warsaw Pact is being aggressively expanded.  In addition to this, there's a wheat harvest failure in the Ukraine and a communist coup in Mexico.  In order to cope, the Soviets and Cubans invade the United States.  Specifically, they invade the small town of Calumet, Colorado and quickly completely take over the town - and many other parts of the USA.  Enter our heroes, a small group of teenagers lead by Jed and Matt Eckert (Swayze and Sheen), who manage to escape the occupation and begin to form a resistance.

Okay, so 1. I do not buy that a group of teenagers who have no military experience and really are just kids who grew up hunting would be able to effectively fight the KGB.  2. I do not buy that the Soviets would be able to invade Colorado without being noticed well before getting to Colorado.  3. NATO consists of more than just the USA and European countries.  4. By the time of the movie, the Cold War was kind of dying down and it was beginning to be pretty clear that the Soviets? Weren't going to win it.

Actually, let's go back to number 2 here.  There are a few ways that the Soviets/Communists could have invaded the USA based on the premise of this movie.  They could have come up through Mexico, in which case they would have hit California, Arizona, Texas, etc, first.  They could have come via the Pacific, in which case they would have hit Alaska, Canada, and Washington state first.  They could have come up through Cuba, in which they would have probably hit Florida first. Finally, they could have flown over the Arctic Sea, in which case thy would have hit Canada first.  There is no way that they randomly hit fucking Colorado first - which thus brings to question just how the hell this was a surprise attack.  Dear movie makers: please consider geography.

This overall problem comes into play with issue number 3 here.  Canada is a part of NATO. Canada has always been a part of NATO.  In the premise of this movie, Canada is still a part of NATO.  In all likelyhood, Canada also had to be invaded in order to get to the USA here.  Thus, two nations would have been invaded.  Furthermore, the whole "the UK is still a part of NATO" thing comes into play.  Even without NATO, Canada has a very delicate relationship with the UK and it's a bit hard to buy that the UK does nothing to come to the aid of two allies, both which they're entered into military alliances with and one which is a part of the Commonwealth.  Just saying.

Then there's the whole issue of 1.  I'm not even sure I want to go there.  Yes, Americans are known for their gun loving ways - yes, it's somewhat of a stereotype.  Yes, Guerrilla warfare can completely screw over traditional armies, and in a lot of ways that's what the Communists are here.  No, a handful of teenagers are not going to successfully fight the KGB for long, nor are they going to be the only resistance.  That's just ridiculous, sorry.

Wednesday 16 January 2013

Jack Reacher (2012)

Genre: Action, Crime, Thriller
Rating: B+

I am not a Jack Reacher fan.  I've never read the books, had never even heard of them before the movie caught my interest.  As such, I have no clue just how wrong for this role Tom Cruise is or just how much they messed up the book.  And, in all honesty, I don't really care - while I am all for trying to be true to the books as much as possible, not knowing the books I can say that this was a good movie and Tom Cruise was great in this role.

In Pittsburgh a man goes to a parking garage, pulls out a sniper rifle, and kills five people.  The case, headed by Detective Emerson (Oyelow), appears to be quickly solved, with all the evidence being linked to former U.S. Army sniper James Barr (Joseph Sikora).  When interrogated by the Detective and the District Attorney Alex Rodin (Jenkins), Barr is given a choice between confessing and facing the death penalty - and instead instructs them to find Jack Reacher (Cruise).  Reacher is a former U.S. Army Military Police Corps Officer who now exists as a drifter and has a history with Barr.  The question is, can Reacher prove Barr's innocence - and does Reacher even want to do so?  Rounding out the case is Barr's defence attorney, and the D.A.'s daughter, Helen Rodin (Pike), who believes that if the case goes to court Barr will not get a fair trial, owing to her father's tactics.  Oh, and then Barr is brutally attacked by fellow inmates and put into a coma, the question now being whether or not he'll be considered fit for trial at all.

I really liked this movie.  The action is great - I particularly loved the car chases which did away with a lot of the jumpy confusion typical of the genre - the humour is snappy, the suspense is sound.  I like how you know whether or not Barr's innocent from the get go, but you still get to watch Reacher and Helen put things together - and see as their opponents try to prevent them from being able to do so.  Pieces start to be put together, but it isn't until closer to the end of the movie that you have it all, and you're liable to be surprised by the picture that you end up seeing - it's not necessarily the one on the box.

I'm not going to comment too much on the book-to-movie transition, because as I've already mentioned, I haven't read the books.  I will say, for those who are unsure of Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher because of the books, the casting came with the support of the author.  In the books, Reacher is a giant of a man and Tom Cruise... well, Tom Cruise is not (although, credit goes to the way they chose to film this, which kind of hides how short he really is... granted, that's a common theme in Tom Cruise movies).   Lee Child has said "Reacher's size in the books is a metaphor for an unstoppable force, which Cruise portrays in his own way" and that "With another actor you might get 100% of the height but only 90% of Reacher. With Tom, you'll get 100% of Reacher with 90% of the height."  Yes, Tom Cruise is short, but there was never a moment in this movie when I thought that he was really anything less than intimidating and a very viable threat.  He definitely portrays an unstoppable force, regardless of how tall he is (or is not).

My final note here is regarding the potential sequel.  There are something like 17 stories written about Jack Reacher, the bulk of which are novels.  It's being reported that a sequel is unlikely due to the film's box-office performance (while it's done well and made more than double what it cost to make, it's about $100 million short of what they wanted if they were to do a sequel), I do hope that they go for it.  This seems like it could be a fun franchise; it's up Tom Cruise's alley, and really I don't need to see another Mission Impossible.  It'd be nice to see Tom Cruise embark on a new franchise.  That being said, I'm also still hoping that Christopher Nolan decides to do another Batman movie with Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Nightwing.  I can't be the only one.

Tuesday 15 January 2013

The Bang Bang Club (2010)

Director: Steven Silver
Genre: Drama
Rating: C+

The Bang Bang Club has two things to really support it: an interesting (and based on truth) story, and a good cast.  These tend to be the makings of great films, which is why it's  so disappointing that this is not really an all together good movie.

Bang Bang Club follows Kevin Carter (Kitsch), Ken Oosterbroek (Rautenbach), João Silva (Van Jaarsveld), and newcomer Greg Marinovich (Phillippe), a group of photographers who together form the Bang Bang Club.  The group is known for the extremes that they have gone to in order to get photos representing the lives - and deaths - of people living in Apartheid South Africa.  Joining them is their editor, Robin Comley (Åkerman).

So, I do have to say that while the acting is good and the story interesting, there's something lost in Bang Bang Club, and I'm really not sure just what it is.  Somehow, the way the story is told removes the actual excitement and the fact that the timing of it is unclear for a lot of the film makes the historical significance of the events a bit unclear.  The passage of time is a bit wonky; it's suggested that a lot of time passes, but I'm not really sure how much, or how quickly, or really if any time did in fact pass.  The acting is good and the idea of it is good, but the story itself is in need of development.

Another thing that I had a problem with was the casting itself.  While I don't think that the acting was bad, it really does annoy me when people are hired to fake an accent.  There are some actors who are great at it - Meryl Streep - and others who are not.  The accents here were probably about midranged, but it still bothers me.  If you're going to do a film about a group of South Africans, hire a group of South Africans.  Not Ryan Phillippe.

Monday 14 January 2013

70th Golden Globe Awards: Results

Last night was the 70th Golden Globe Awards.  Which, you know, were entertaining and what not.  Stuff happened, awards were won, Jodie Foster came out (which I swear, I thought she did a few years ago?).

Best Picture - Drama Best Picture - Musical or Comedy Best Actor (Drama)
Argo
Les Misérables
 Daniel Day Lewis, Lincoln
Best Actress (Drama) Best Actor (Musical or Comedy) Best Actress (Musical or Comedy)
 Jessica Chastain, Zero Dark Thirty
Hugh Jackman, Les Misérables
 Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook
Best Supporting Actor Best Supporting Actress Best Director
Christoph Waltz, Django Unchained 
Anne Hathaway, Les Misérables
 Ben Affleck, Argo
Best Screenplay Best Original Score Best Original Song
 Quentin Tarantino, Django Unchained
Life of Pi
"Skyfall," Skyfall
Best Animated Feature Best Foreign Language Film
 Brave
Amour

Best Series (Drama)
Best Series (Musical or Comedy) Best Actor (Drama)
 Homeland
Girls
 Damien Lewis, Homeland
Best Actress (Drama) Best Actor (Musical or Comedy) Best Actress (Musical or Comedy)
 Claire Danes, Homeland
Don Cheadle, House of Lies
 Lena Dunham, Girls
Best Actor (Miniseries or TV Film) Best Actress (Miniseries or TV Film) Best Supporting Actor
 Kevin Costner, Hatfields & McCoys
Julianne Moore, Game Change
 Ed Harris, Game Change
Best Supporting Actress Best Miniseries or TV Film Cecil B. DeMille Award
Maggie Smith, Downton Abbey
Game Change
Jodie Foster

So, a few notes.  I either agreed with or had no opinion on most of the awards (more an agreed with in regards to the movies and no opinion in regards to the TV).  I didn't think that Argo really deserved to win as many awards as it did - the movie is good, yes, but it does bother me as both a Canadian and a historian, and I thought other films were more deserving.  I kind of wish that Bradley Cooper had won best actor instead of Hugh Jackman, and I'm a bit divided on the best actress for a dramatic TV show.  I love that Maggie Smith won her category, and that Anne Hathaway won hers - I also really loved Anne Hathaway's acceptance speech.

For the most part I was neither wowed nor bored by the presenters, although I did think that Jennifer Garner's continuation of husband Ben Affleck's acceptance speech when she presented was a bit tacky.  I did really love Kristen Wiig and Will Ferrell's bit - I thought it was great. I also loved how Robert Downey, Jr introduced Jodie Foster.  Oh; the Megan Fox/Jonah Hill thing was lame.  Hosts Tina Fey and Amy Poehler were also great, I particularly loved their monologue and the Sarah Palin jokes.

Finally, Jodie Foster.  I loved her acceptance speech - from when she was talking about her career in general to when she came out.  I was a bit surprised by the coming out itself, not because I didn't realize she was gay but because I swear to God the coming out happened a few years ago when her and long-time partner Cydney Bernard broke up.  She wasn't exactly in the closet anymore, she was simply not commenting on her personal life - something that I respect.  Regardless of her sexuality, I think she was really deserving of the Cecil B. DeMille Award, after nearly 50 years in the film business.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Author: J.K. Rowling
Genre: Fantasy
Rating: A

Okay, so this is my favourite of the Harry Potter books.  I love the story within it, the way that the it plays out and the way that things relate to the overall series.  I love the idea of Harry finally becoming good at potions, like his mother before hand, even with the aid of a book (I also love the idea of him working with the aid of a book and Hermione frowning upon it).  The horcruxes are awesome as is the back story of Voldemort that we're given here, and the relationship between Harry and Dumbledore is further developed. Oh! And love is in the air, as the canonical pairings become very clear here.

It's year six at Hogwarts, and Harry's back and taking private lessons from Dumbledore himself with the aim of learning how to defeat Voldemort.  Harry's also captain of the Quidditch team, the favourite student of new potions professor, Horace Slughorn, and increasingly attracted to his best friend's younger sister, Ginny.  It's all great.  Oh, except for one thing: someone keeps on attacking students, and no one's sure who or how to stop it - although Harry is rather determined that the culprit is none other than Draco Malfoy.

The one bad thing about this book is Harry's obsession with Draco throughout it.  Very quickly on, Harry begins to annoy his friends by obsessing over what Draco's up to, and it doesn't take long for him to begin to annoy me with it as well.  Regardless of whether or not Draco is actually up to something (no spoilers), Harry's obsession is still annoying.

That being said, I absolutely loved the rest of the book.  The backstory, the pensive, the horcruxes, the consequences that it has for the rest of the series - the implications that it has for the things that happened before.  Love it all.  The fact that we get to really see why Harry is the Chosen one and what it all means and now what he's going to do with it is great.  The fact that people area actually supporting him through this, even though they don't all necessarily know as much as he does is also great.  Plus Harry and Ginny! I love them together, and I love how we got to see more of her in this book, although I do have to say it wasn't enough.  It's never enough - Ginny's probably my favourite character, and I always want more of her.

Sunday 13 January 2013

Week in Review: January 7 - 12

Awards - This was an award filled week.  First up was the People's Choice Awards, followed by the Critic's Choice Awards.  Most importantly, though, were this years Academy Award nominations.

Birthdays -  Birthdays this week included David Bowie - who announced the release of new music - the Duchess of Cambridge, and Diana Gabaldon.

Movies - Three movies this week; Judd Apatow's Knocked Up and it's sort-of-sequel This is 40 and the teen party film Project X.  The best is, by far, This is 40, and the worst is, also by far, Project X.

Books - Continuing with the Terry Pratchett novels, this week we did the City Watch Discworld novel Men at Arms which was awesome.

TV - No TV this week, sorry. Life got a bit in the way.

Recommendations - Two limited releases this week, Quartet and Struck by Lightning, both of which look great, and the wider release Gangster Squad.  I want to see all of these.

Next Week - Tomorrow we'll continue the Harry Potter-a-thon with Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, and a review of this year's Golden Globes. Movie of the week will be Gangster Squad which I've been anxious to see for months now.  Not sure about the rest of the week, but there'll be something.

Requests - Anything I should watch? Let me know!

Friday 11 January 2013

Birthday: Diana Gabaldon

Today is the 61st birthday of author Diana Gabaldon.

Gabaldon is best known for her Outlander series, which I've been slowly making my way through review, but she's also done a series of shorter works based on a secondary character in the Outlander novels, Lord John Grey.  More recently, she's also taken to writing a series of short stories based in the Outlander world but not actually set during the time of Outlander - including "A Leaf on the Wind of All Hallows" and the forthcoming "The Space Between."  Oh, and there's the Outlander graphic novel, The Exile.  So, yeah. She's a busy woman.

Happy birthday, Ms. Gabaldon!

18th Critics' Choice Awards: Results

So, last night was the 18th Critic's Choice Awards.  Once again, I didn't watch it, but here are the results and my commentary.

Best Picture Best Actor Best Actress
Argo

Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln
Jessica Chastain, Zero Dark Thirty
I really don't think Argo should have won here.  Sure, it was good, but not the best picture.  There were other movies that were a lot better in this category

I actually really agree with this.  While I don't necessarily think Lincoln should win its best picture noms, I do think Daniel Day-Lewis deserves the win for best actor
I still haven't seen this yet, but I really want to and this just makes me want to more
Best Supporting Actor Best Supporting Actress Best Young Actor/Actress
Philip Seymour Hoffman, The Master

Anne Hathaway, Les Misérables
Quvenzhané Wallis, Beasts of the Southern Wild
I really think that anyone in this category could have won. Except for Matthew McConaughey. I don't know how he got nominated

Yes. Just yes. This was so deserved.
I really want to see this now, just based on how much award recognition this has gotten
Best Acting Ensemble Best Director Best Original Screenplay
Silver Linings Playbook

Ben Affleck, Argo
Quentin Tarantino, Django Unchained
This was well deserved, but then once again, I think anyone could have won here

I kind of think that anyone else could have been a better win than this. Sorry, Ben Affleck, I love you, but yeah
Once again, this is making me want to see Django Unchained
Best Adapted Screenplay Best Cinematography Best Art Direction
Tony Kushner, Lincoln

Life of Pi
Anna Karenina
I can see this.  There were a lot of good nominations in this category

Now I really want to see Life of Pi
This was another really good category.  Everyone could have won
Best Editing Best Costume Design Best Makeup
Zero Dark Thirty

Anna Karenina
Cloud Atlas
Really want to see this!

I think any one of the films nominated here deserved to win
Ditto
Best Visual Effects Best Animated Feature Best Action Movie
Life of Pi

Wreck-It Ralph
Skyfall
Ditto, again

Wreck-It Ralph is definitely the best nominated here
Any one could have won
Best Actor in an Action Movie Best Actress in an Action Movie Best Comedy
Daniel Craig, Skyfall
Jennifer Lawrence, The Hunger Games
Silver Linings Playbook
I think I would have actually gone with Joseph Gordon-Levitt in Looper here

I'm not sure who I would have gone with here. I do kind of question how Gina Carano got nominated though
I think this could have gone anyway, to be honest
Best Actor in a Comedy Best Actress in a Comedy Best Sci-Fi/Horror Movie
Bradley Cooper, Silver Linings Playbook

Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook
Looper
Bradley Cooper really deserved this. So did Paul Rudd

I love how Jennifer Lawrence won both the action and comedy categories. I think she was the best win here
Yes. Yes, yes, yes. Although, how did Prometheus get nominated?
Best Foreign Film Best Documentary Feature Best Song
Amour
Searching for Sugar Man
"Skyfall," Skyfall
I really want to see everything in this category

I have no comment.  The only one I'm actually interested in here is Bully
I love this song, so much


Best Score



John Williams, Lincoln



Of course John Williams won. John Williams should always win