Argo (2012)

Starring: Ben Affleck, Bryan Cranston, Alan Arkin, John Goodman

Director: Ben Affleck

Genre: Biography, Drama, Thriller

Rating: A-

"The whole country is watching you, they just don't know it."

I'm just going to start this by stating that I'm not an American.  I do not now live in the States, nor have I ever lived there.  As such I really don't buy into the whole "rah, rah, yay America!" act that a lot of movies do.  I am, however, a historian, and as such I love historical films because in my opinion history is always an interesting story and has so much drama to it... in a story like the one of the Canadian Capers, you don't need to add fictional elements - the story is already there.

Argo is the story of the Canadian Capers, although to my disappointment it does do a lot of fiction weaving within the story.  During the 1979 Iranian Revolution the U.S. embassy in Tehran is taken over by Islamic militants, with the bulk of the American employees being taken as hostages.  Six of them, however, managed to escape and take cover in the home of the Canadian ambassador Ken Taylor (played by actual Canadian Victor Garber).  Enter the CIA: specialist Tony Mendez (Affleck) is brought to help come up with a way to get the Americans out of Iran, and he comes up with the idea of posing as a film crew in Iran scouting locations for a science fiction movie.  With the help of Hollywood make-up artist John Chambers (Goodman) and film producer Lester Siegel (Arkin) Tony creates an elaborate plot, goes in to Iran, and sets out to save the Americans.

In regards to the necessary components of a good film, Argo really does have it all.  There's suspense and action, and it really makes your heart race.  Even going into the movie with a basic knowledge of what happened and the end results, I was sitting on the edge of my seats anxious to see whether the Capers would make it out, and if so just how. There's a lot of humour to it too, some of it appropriate and some of it less so, but all of it good.  One of my favourite lines was when one of the Capers said that they were a Canadian, then tossed in the obligatory "eh."  Somehow I think the laugh in the Canadian theatre that I was in was somewhat different from the one that was intended to get from that.  There were a lot of laughs like that, one liners that you really weren't expecting but had everyone in the theatre laughing.  Some were lines that you saw in the trailer, but in the actual film it was somehow funnier.

That being said... as both a historian and a Canadian, I do have problems with this movie.  It was really enjoyable, I'll give you that, and I can even understand why it's getting Oscar buzz.  However, there are huge liberties taken with the history of this film (and the portrayal of the characters within it, Affleck's getting a fair bit of flack for choosing to portray the Latino Mendez).  The story itself is changed in order to create some sort of suspense and an action sequence, particularly in the latter third of the film.  I really can't see how this is necessary, and as someone who's read a bit about this incident and who is interested in history, it bothers me that filmmakers (in general, not just Affleck) feel the need to do this.  The story is already there, they don't need to change it in order to make it better.  The reason why the Canadian Caper is such a great story is not because Affleck was able to introduce a good chase scene, it's a great story because it's about people coming together to do what many would think to be impossible.  When you couple it with the postscript that initially accompanied the film (which I haven't read itself, but reports of it say that it essentially indicated that the CIA let Taylor take credit for the incident, implying that he doesn't really deserve the accolades he (and the Canadian government) received because this incident), it becomes a bit of an insult and a piece of pro-American propaganda.  That in itself was a disappointment.  While the postscript was changed, the film itself still keeps much of that tone.

Total Recall (2012)

Starring: Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Bryan Cranston, Jon Cho, Bill Nighy

Director: Len Wiseman

Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

Rating: B-

I'm a little ashamed to admit it, but I actually really enjoyed this movie.  The acting isn't superb, the plot is weak at points, it's not really moving on an emotional level or funny or anything.  At its core, Total Recall is a mindless action flick set in a dystopian future.  It isn't meant to have a great plot or great acting or connect on an emotional level (the lack of funny, however, is a bit of a disappointment).  It's supposed to have awesome chase scenes, mind blowing special effects, and cool gun fights.  Total Recall has all of this and more - in addition to it all, it also has this awesome futuristic world.  Sure the science is sketchy, but damnit, it's science fiction.  The science doesn't have to be right, it's fiction.

Total Recall follows factory worker Douglas Quaid (Farrell) as he begins to realize that his life is not exactly what it seems.  After a series of nightmares in which he is a spy of some sorts running from the police, Quaid decides to visit Rekall, a company that implants memories into its clients.  You can go anywhere, do anything, be anything.  While he's at Rekall, however, things go horribly wrong and before he's even put under it's revealed that Quaid is in fact a spy, who worked for a resistance movement.  From here his life goes to shit as his wife, Lori (Beckinsale), reveals that she isn't really his wife but rather a cop who's been assigned to watch him.  Quaid must flee from her, and by extension the entire paramilitary police force of both the United Federation of Britain (UFB) and the Colony (otherwise known as Australia), the only two habitual land masses on the planet.  Oh, and in it all, the girl from his dreams, Melina (Biel), appears.

The plot and characters in Total Recall are somewhat weak.  There isn't really the emotional connection between them and the viewer that the original film had.  I will give the film a lot of credit, however, in that it doesn't just totally rip off the original movie; while it follows the same basic plot and much of the general storyline, it also goes on a number of different directions.  This Total Recall is a lot more political than its predecessor, although never in a really original way.  It's very much anti-militaristic totalitarian and rather pro-workers, which is pretty much what you expect of a movie like this.  There's a lot of development towards this aspect of the plot, just not the characters themselves - I actually don't think I would have known the name of Biel's character if not for Wikipedia (and the fact that it's the same name as used in the 1990 version).

That being said, though, the movie's fun.  The special effects are cool, the chase scenes are hot. Every action movie is pretty much required to have a chase scene at one point or another, and in Total Recall it does so with hover cars.  Hover car chase scenes are the best.  The science is a bit wonky, but who cares - they go through the center of the earth.  Going through the center of the earth is always awesome.  The thing with the original Total Recall is that, while it's got a good plot and is emotionally charged the futuristic elements are rather lame and dated.  It's something that's a bit characteristic of older science fiction movies, which makes them a bit annoying to watch in the present day.  In this Total Recall, however, everything is slick and smooth and very much along the lines of what the future would look like if current trends continue.  I'm sure in another twenty years I'll be saying that the futuristic technology used in this Total Recall is rather old, dated, and lame when they remake the movie again, but for now it looked damn awesome.

I think, though, that my favourite part of this movie was the way that it differed from the original film while also paying tribute to it.  There's no Mars, but they mention it.  There's no huge brothel, but there's still a three breasted prostitute (no midget prostitute, however, sorry).  There's a fat woman who's travelling to the UFB for two weeks.  There are more moments like this, and to be honest every time they happened I smiled.  I enjoyed them.  Total Recall knew it was a remake of an older classic and assumes that you've seen the original.  It doesn't try to be some grand, fantastic movie.  It's a mindless action flick, and it does mindless action damn well.

Drive (2011)

Starring: Ryan Gosling, Carey Mulligan, Bryan Cranston, Christina Hendricks, Ron Perlman, Oscar Isaac, Albert Brooks

Director: Nicolas Winding Refn
Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller, Neo Noir
Rating: A+

This is definitely one of my favourite movies of all time.  There are a few key elements of it that make it so epic-ly awesome: it's awesomely and subtly acted, it's unpredictable, and it blows your mind.  The first time that I saw it was in theatres and there were a few key points during which I actually jumped out of my seat (fortunately, I was at Station Square and there wasn't really anyone else there).

Drive follows an unnamed man, the Driver (Gosling) through a life changing journey.  At the start of the film he's a man with... questionable morals; by day he works as a stuntman and a mechanic, and by night he works as a getaway driver.  When he's working as a getaway driver the Driver has a set of rules; he only works anonymously, he never works for the same people twice, and he only allows them five minutes to get their business done.  It is implied, although not confirmed, that the Driver has not been caught at his night job.  The Driver's daytime boss and night time connection is Shannon (Cranston), a man with a mixed past and many ties to the mob.  Shannon is hoping to get mobster Bernie Ross (Brooks) to buy a stock car for the Driver to race; Bernie's partner Nino (Perlman), thinks the idea is ridiculous and doesn't trust Shannon - whose pelvis he once had broken because of Shannon's habit to overcharge.  While the Driver's business life is becoming a bit more shady his personal life is becoming a bit more involved; one day he meets his neighbour Irene (Mulligan) and her son Benicio (Kaden Leos), and becomes close to the two.  Despite having clear romantic feelings for Irene things are complicated when her husband Standard (Isaac) is released from jail, and complicated further when it becomes clear that Standard owes money and needs the Driver's help - help that, if it isn't procured threatens Irene and Benicio.

Ryan Gosling's performance in this is amazing.  The thing that really makes it a powerful performance is the fact that Driver is a largely silent man; there are entire scenes that go by with him barely saying a word.  He really has to show the audience what he's thinking and feeling, rather than simply tell them, and he's extremely successful in doing so.  Driver has questionable morals, but it's very clear to see just what he values and what he takes pride in.  His feelings for Irene are never really spoken but from the beginning it's clear how he feels, and the chemistry between the two is very convincing.  The other actors all seem to kind of fall in around Gosling's performance; none of them are over the top, none of them fail to be convincing.  The scenes between Cranston and Gosling especially are intriguing as they have rather clashing personalities; Cranston's Shannon being a very talkative, morally deviant, and rather weak willed man, while the Driver is strong and silent, even if his actions aren't always right.  That's the other thing that I like about this film - there are so many shades of grey here.  The villains are clearly established, but even some of them are somewhat likeable. The good guys are also clearly established, but they're not always that likeable either, and they operate on the same shades of grey that the villains operate under.  Asides from Benicio, who as a child is an innocent, the purest character in this film is Irene - who has feelings for the Driver, despite being married, and really is married to a convict, giving one just reason to question her own morals.  I could say more, but I fear doing so and spoiling the movie.  Instead, I'll leave this off with a bit of a warning: this is a very gritty and dark movie; it's smarter than the average crime, car chase type film, but it's also a lot more gruesome and violent.

Rock of Ages (2012)

Stars: Diego Boneta, Julianne Hough, Russell Brand, Paul Giamatti, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Mary J. Blige, Malin Åkerman, Alec Baldwin, Tom Cruise, Bryan Cranston
Director: Adam Shankman
Genre: Comedy, Drama, Musical
Rating: A

If you dislike musicals, cheesy romances, or 80s metal pop then Rock of Ages is not your cup of tea.  With that warning out, I have to say that Rock of Ages was absolutely awesome.  From the moment that Hough and a bus full of extras began singing “Sister Christian” I was hooked.  The music in this film is awesome – albeit a bit too dependent on “Don’t Stop Believing” for the post-Glee era – and will get you tapping your feet, nodding your head, and maybe even sing along as the film progresses.  The acting is also amazing, from the big names who are known for their acting to those who really aren’t – I suspect this is the only time I’ll ever be saying that a Russell Brand movie was epic and awesome.

Rock of Ages is a multidimensional movie; it presents itself first as being about a girl from Oklahoma, Sherrie Christian (Hough), trying to make it big and find love in Los Angeles.  On her first day in the city she meets barback and fellow singer Drew Boley (Boneta) and lands a job working with him at The Bourbon Room – a nightclub on the Sunset Strip known for being where some amazing albums were recorded.  There’s more to the film than just that though; Bourbon Room owner Dennis Dupree (Baldwin) owes taxes and is being threatened with the closure of his club, with a protest against it and the Strip in general being helmed by a group of religious, conservative mothers lead by Patricia Whitmore (Zeta-Jones), wife of Mayor Mike Whitman (Cranston).  Wrapping it all up is Stacee Jaxx (Cruise), rock legend and lead singer of the band Arsenal.  At the start of the film Arsenal is about to play their last gig ever, as Stacee is about to embark on a solo act – as encouraged by his manager Paul Gill (Giamatti) and questioned by Rolling Stones reporter Constance Sack (Åkerman).

I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again: the music in Rock of Ages is awesome.  For the most part the cast are all good singers, or at least had parts that related well to their vocal ranges.  When it comes to the songs of Bon Jovi, Def Leppard, and Whitesnake Tom Cruise really can sing.  Alec Baldwin can’t, and neither can Paul Giamatti, but their singing parts were considerably less than the other members of the cast, and as already mentioned what they had to sing really did fit their voices and roles.  My one problem with the music overall was the fact that I felt that the songs didn’t go on long enough.  A lot of them were felt like very, very shortened versions of the songs that we know and love, which was a bit of a disappointment.  To really make up for this a few of the songs are also done as medleys, which I think really worked.  These songs complement each other, and by doing them as medleys the film is able to interconnect and juxtapose the different plots.  You also have to say something about the way the music is done in general.  I made a comment in my review for High School Musical 2 about how they’re singing and dancing about how singing and dancing is lame.  In Rock of Ages they sing rock songs to protest against rock music – while doing choreography that involves pelvic thrusts and gyrating hips, in a church.  While it's rather lame in High School Musical 2 it's awesome in Rock of Ages.

The story is awesome as well; a lot of it is pretty tried and tested, from the young lovers, to the old, down-on-his-luck club owner, to the religious fanatic with a past.  If you can’t identify at least five other movies that tell the basically the same stories that Rock of Ages has you’re not really trying.  The way that the film puts these stories together, however, is fun and in parts original and a bit shocking.  This movie is also funny, with my favourite character being Stacee Jaxx’s alcohol serving, violence prone baboon, Hey Man.  That’s right, there’s an alcohol serving, violence prone baboon.  What more can you ask for in a movie?