Showing posts with label Patrick J. Abrams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patrick J. Abrams. Show all posts

Saturday, 6 October 2012

Suits (Season 2, Summer)

Courtesy of Wikipedia
Creator: Aaron Korsh
Genre: Legal Drama
Rating: A

So, for the second season of Suits things are changed up a bit: the bulk of the season aired in the summer, like the first season did, with a continuation of the season in January.  Rather than just hold off on doing a review of the season after this second part has aired, I've decided to divide my reviews, much like they've divided the season, and treat it as two separate entities.  That having been said, I really liked this part of season two of Suits.  I would even go so far as to say that I preferred it to season one.  While there were some elements that made me nervous it really separated itself from the things that I found to be problematic in the first season - and did so really quickly.

The second season continues to follow the trials and struggles of associate Mike Ross (Adams) and senior partner Harvey Specter (Macht) in the law firm Pearson Hardman.  The season opens with the firm's managing partner, Jessica Pearson (Torres), dealing with the revelation that Mike did not go to Harvard - or law school in general.  Before she can have him fired, however, firm founder, and nemesis to Jessica and Harvey, Daniel Hardman (David Costabile) returns to the firm, with the apparent intention of having Jessica and Harvey removed from the firm.  This becomes the main focus of the season, as Harvey and Mike both struggle to keep their jobs.  Rounding it out is the ongoing emotions between Mike and paralegal Rachel Zane (Markle), with the question of will-they-or-won't-they constantly hanging overhead.

So, my biggest problems last season were the overall plot with Jenny (Vanessa Ray) and Trevor (Tom Lipinski), as well as the fact that Louis Litt (Hoffman) didn't really seem to fit into the overall tone of the series.  Both of these problems were handled here.  Jenny and Trevor both fade into the background - and while they might come back in the future, I no longer think that's the direction that the show wants to go in.  Louis got a lot better too.  The character no longer seemed to be a joke and the way in which he was used actually had to do with the show's plot.  I'm still not a big fan of the character, but you're not supposed to be, and I do think he's at least getting better.

At first I was a bit hesitant about the overall plot of this season.  I wasn't exactly sure how Hardman fit into things and was a bit bored by what I thought was going to be a one or two episode stunt of "let's try to get Harvey disbarred."  Then the season started to pick up and this stunt became a lot more interesting.  I still think it was a stunt, but it was definitely intriguing and enjoyable.  They built on what had already been established in the first season and went with it.  I like that, and I liked it.  Suits season 2.0 really won me over.

Sunday, 1 July 2012

Suits (Season 1)

Courtesy of Wikipedia
Creator: Aaron Korsh
Genre: Legal Drama
Rating: A-

I first came across Suits pretty much by accident; it was one of the summer TV series talked about in an article on TV.com.  Having now watched the first season, I have to say that I'm glad I read that article.  While Suits definitely descends into stereotypes territory it is an interesting and intriguing story.  The show follows Mike Ross (Abrams), a brilliant young man with questionable ethics - when he was in university he was expelled after being caught selling an exam to the Dean's student, and since then he's made a living by taking tests for other people.  Mike has an eidetic memory, enabling him to consume and regurgitate vast quantities of information even though he's never completed a formal education.  This skill of Mike's proves useful for hot-shot lawyer Harvey Specter (Macht), who at the start of the series is told by his boss, Jessica Pearson (Torres), that he has to hire an associate attorney.  After a chance meeting Harvey quickly decides that he likes Mike and hires him, despite knowing that Mike isn't a lawyer and didn't go to Harvard, which his firm exclusively hires from.

Season One of Suits is largely episodic, focusing on the cases that the two of them work on, both together and independently.  Each of these cases is interesting, from the actual clients to the way in which they fight the legal battle in order to win.  The clients were mostly flashy and rich - the show itself really has that feel to it - but some of the most heartwarming elements of it were when Mike or Harvey took on a pro-bono case.  Heartwarming might not be the right word exactly, but I definitely think that my favourite cases were the pro-bono ones.  They seemed to really test the duo, especially Mike, in unexpected ways. What really intrigues me, though, is the more subtle serial elements of the show that suggest it's leading up to something greater in later seasons.  The struggle that Mike goes through in order to constantly hide his not-actually being a lawyer from Harvard is suspenseful.  I also like the even more subtle growth of Harvey.  He doesn't change much, but as the series progresses you get to see more of who he is and what makes him the way he is.  It's interesting.

Beyond Mike and Harvey are the more secondary characters of the show; while being a legal procedural, the show is also really character driven.  I like the way that Torres portrays the very strong Jessica Pearson, and the show addresses the fact that she's in a position not usually held by women without mocking her.  The relationship between her and Harvey is one of the best in the show, as is that between Rachel Zane (Markle) and Mike.  I'm torn about the character of Donna Paulsen (Rafferty), Harvey's secretary.  At times it almost seems like the show writers aren't entirely sure what her personality is; she bounces between being this eccentric, zany woman who doesn't really seem to fit the show and a still eccentric but strong woman, who fits in perfectly at Pearson Hardman.  As for Louis Litt (Hoffman)... I could really do without the character.  While I get that he's supposed to be the antagonist of the firm, to a degree, I just feel like personality-wise he's better fitted for a show that isn't so serious.  It's almost as if the creators decided that the show was too serious and decided to inject a comedic character, then decided that rather than going with something that fit the overall tone of show it was better to go with someone who felt like he was out of some cancelled sitcom.

I'm going to have to admit, I didn't really care for some of the secondary characters, who act as further antagonists.  I don't care about the character of Jenny (Vanessa Ray) at all, and I'm bored by the whole Trevor (Tom Lipinski) plot line.  I realize that it's going to continue to be a part of the show, but I could do without it.