Showing posts with label Billy Burke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Billy Burke. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 December 2012

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 (2012)

Director: Bill Condon
Genre: Fantasy, Romance
Rating: C+

I take back my earlier proclamation of The Twilight Saga: Eclipse being my favourite movie in this series.  Having now seen them all, I can say without a doubt that The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 is my favourite. It's the most dramatic, the best acted, and really the most solid film in the series.  There's still a lot that's a bit ridiculous, but it's solid.  You can also kind of tell that they've really put a lot of money into this one,  especially in regards to the special effects.  The cast really don't look like they're covered in pancake makeup anymore, the wigs look better, and so on.  I do question some of the outfits - and how turning into a vampire gave Kristen Stewart fake eyelashes - but it's a lot better than the earlier films.

Breaking Dawn opens with Bella (Stewart) having changed into a vampire and going on her first hunt with husband Edward (Pattinson).  Bella must adapt to being a vampire and the pair must adapt to being parents (while also still being newlyweds), to their human-vampire hybrid daughter, Renesmee, nicknamed Nessie (played first by a creepy CGI baby, then by Mackenzie Foy).  Early problems that arise are werewolf Jacob (Lautner) having imprinted on Nessie, Bella's feeding, all the sex that they can now have, Nessie's rapid aging and the potential consequences of it, and what to tell Bella's father, Charlie (Burke).  Then fellow vampire Irina (Maggie Grace) sees Renesmee and, assuming that she is an immortal child, tells the Volturi that the Cullens have broken the vampire law.  Alice (Greene) sees a vision of the Volturi coming to punish the Cullens, setting them on the path to trying to stop them.  The family head travel throughout the world in an attempt to gather up enough witnesses to prevent the Volturi from simply massacring them all.  Then Alice and her lover Jasper (Rathbone) disappear, leading the Cullens to believe that it means that they are doomed to die.  The question is, whether or not they can survive the meeting with the Volturi.

So, yeah.  A lot of the earlier cheese of the films is gone.  The general problems have been resolved, and things that are silly have either been largely dropped or so accepted so as to no longer really be an issue.  One of the things that I liked most about this film was that Edward really chilled out here.  There's no conflict between him and Bella, there's no whining about her being a human (because she isn't), or about him needing to protect her (because he doesn't), or what how.  For the first time the two are treated as equals.  There's also absolutely no conflict between Edward and Jacob; the two are completely on the same side, which is great. It makes the plot so much less annoying.

The cheese that does remain is funny.  Bella as a vampire? Funny.  Bella learning that Jacob imprinted on Renesme and nicknamed her Nessie? Hilarious. There's more to it than just that, and it's all great.  This movie is probably the funniest of the series, and intentionally so.  The many other vampires that they introduce here are far better than the ones that we've gotten used to over the course of the series.  There are so many, it's hard to pick a favourite - I think the Russians, Vladimir (Noel Fisher) and Stefan (Guri Weinberg), although Lee Pace's Garret is also great.

Another thing that I really liked is the opening and closing credits.   I thought the opening credits were really well done in general, and nicely fit the theme for the series.  In particular, I enjoyed how the cast names changed from red - representing the human - to white - representing the vampire.  I thought it was a cool touch.  For the closing credits I actually really enjoyed how they credited people from all five movies - Bella's human family and friends, the Cullens and their vampire friends and family, the Volturi, the Pack and other Quileute people.  I thought it was a nice touch, a "these are the people that helped us get to this point."

The rest of this contains spoilers.  My absolute favourite part of the movie, and my least favourite part, is the actual face off with the Volturi.  Michael Sheen is probably one of the best actors that has appeared in this series, which says a lot because really there are some good actors here.  The ending in the books is kind of lame.  There's a point in the conflict when Alice returns and shows Aro a vision, then Aro and the Volturi back down and the conflict is resolved.  There's no fighting, no deaths, no nothing.  In the movie, however, we see Alice's vision, without realizing that it's a vision.  As a result, there's this epic battle full of great fight sequences and a lot of deaths.  There's a lot more emotion in this one scene than in the rest of the series.  The thing that got me about the Twilight books is that it never made me cry.  There was no sacrifice in the books.  This apparent ending, however, is so drastically different from the books that as people start dying I realized just how emotionally invested I had become and how attached I was to the characters.  There was also a moment when it happened that I couldn't help but think that the ending of the movie was going to be a giant fuck you to author Stephenie Meyer, who has said (about The Host) that she's not sure how she feels about killing off characters.  There's a lot about these movies, especially in the promotions for it, that make it rather apparent that the cast don't really like the books or movies themselves and for a moment I really felt like this was the cast and crew's way of really vocalizing that thought. It ended up not being that, but for a moment as we see Alice's vision and don't realize that's what it is I was thinking that this ending was so much better than the one Stephenie Meyer wrote. It didn't end up being the ending, but it was fun while it lasted.

Thursday, 13 December 2012

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 (2011)

Director: Bill Condon
Genre: Fantasy, Romance
Rating: C+

These movies somehow seem to just get more and more ridiculous with each passing film.  The thing that I really like about The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 is that it does away with the ridiculous melodrama of the love triangle and introduces new ridiculous melodrama.  The new melodrama is still really rather lame, but it's such a relief to be done with the love triangle bullshit.

Breaking Dawn opens with the prelude to the wedding of the human Bella Swan (Stewart) and her vampire lover Edward Cullen (Pattinson).  Werewolf, best friend, and former would-be-lover Jacob Black (Lautner) is very upset about this and laments the impending loss of Bella's humanity - and is outright pissed off when he realizes that Bella and Edward intend to go on their honeymoon before Bella is turned.  This honeymoon plan turns to be rather screwy for them all, as during it Bella gets pregnant with Edward's baby.  The rest of this movie then deals with the vampires and werewolves each dealing with the consequences of this impending birth.

Soo, yeah.  Ridiculous melodrama.  But somehow it's funny ridiculous melodrama.  Once again, the cast seems to know that the basic concept of this movie is silly and they just go with it.  Once again, I'm going to say that they're all better actors than people give them credit for for not laughing half the time in this movie.  Especially the scene where Bella discovers she's pregnant.  The fact that they were able to play that straight makes them far better actors than we like to give them credit for.

The real strong part of this movie is the fact that it moves on from the love triangle while maintaining that continuity.  Jacob is still in love with Bella and he still makes it clear that he loves her and he will always protect her, but he is no longer trying to win her.  He knows he's lost and he's accepting that, or at least trying to.  There's no more Bella being annoyed with him for hitting on her, or struggling to make a decision between him and Edward.  There's also the fact that Edward seems to have truly accepted Jacob as a part of Bella's, and by extension his, life.  I kind of felt like this whole plot lasted at least a movie longer than it needed to, so I was happy to be done with it.

The weak point in this movie is how they tried to draw suspense out of things that I don't think were really all that suspenseful.  There is suspense in this movie - especially pertaining to the likelihood of Bella's survival and what this child is going to be like - but what they try to make suspenseful isn't.  Like whether or not drinking blood is going to be helpful to Bella.  Not suspenseful, don't cue the drawn out sequences and music.  You know what was suspenseful?  The way the movie ends - at least until you see the trailer for the next film.  That kind of killed that.

Thursday, 6 December 2012

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (2010)

Director: David Slade
Genre: Fantasy, Romance
Rating: C

As weird as it is to say this, I think this is actually my favourite of the Twilight movies.  The plot is still meh, and the acting is still meh, and the special effects and the makeup are still meh,  but the humour has transitioned from being unintentional to... well, I'm not sure how intentional it is and how unintentional it is.  The point is, there is humour in this one.  And action.  And no lame suicide plots.

People are being killed in Seattle, but our friendly neighbourhood vampires are only concerned about how it might affect them.  Likewise with our friendly neighbourhood werewolves.  Alice (Greene) is monitoring the decisions being made by the villainous Victoria (Howard),  as we all know it's only a matter of time before she makes yet another attempt on Bella (Stewart).  Meanwhile, Bella and Edward (Pattinson) are discussing marriage - although both Bella's best friend and would-be-lover Jacob (Lautner) and her father Charlie (Burke) are dead set against the relationship between the two, although for different reasons.  Oh, and once shit does start to go down the friendly neighbourhood vampires and friendly neighbourhood werewolves try to work together.

So, yeah.  The thing that works about this movie is the humour.  My favourite scene in this entire movie - possibly the entire series - is when Bella and Charlie have what is the most awkward sex talk ever.  That alone made this movie worth watching.  There are other moments like this one that really make me think that the actors are far better than we give them credit for just because they're able to keep a straight face throughout it all.  That's not to say that the acting itself is in any way all that good, but that it's not as bad as we claim it is.  I also do like how the plot moves forward here.  The first two movies were really all about setting things up and introducing us to characters and concepts - vampires, werewolves, the Volturi, etc.  This time round things actually go forward and stuff happens.  There's even a whole epic battle!  It's not all bad!

Not all bad, but still not all that good.  The plot still has gigantic holes, ones that I think if I really tried to wrap my head around and explain I would just end up either confused or pissed off - or both.  I still want to spend most of my time yelling at the characters, or at least the main ones.  The thing about Twilight in general is that the more sympathetic and loveable characters are the ones that don't get as much of a focus.  I love Bella's friends from high school, and Charlie, and even the vampires and werewolves who are not Edward or Jacob.  We get to see a bit more of these characters here, although I know it's not a trend that's going to continue.  The triangle is resolved here, and the next two movies are going to be all about the lovefest and its consequences.  Yay?

Thursday, 29 November 2012

The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009)

Director: Chris Weitz
Genre: Fantasy, Romance
Rating: D

Remember how I didn't like Twilight?  Somehow, the followup to it, The Twilight Saga: New Moon (because evidently the viewing public is incapable of determining that something is a sequel to another movie unless there's words that are the same) succeeds in making Twilight look good.

The run down: Edward (Pattinson) and Bella (Stewart) are living happily ever after, minus the whole her whining about being human and him refusing to turn her into a vampire because, really, why would you take the advice of the guy who tried to kill you in the last movie? Bella is particularly whiney about the issue because she's turning eighteen, which is one year older than her eternal lover, except not really.  At a party for her at his family's house, however, her mortality becomes all too aparent when she gets a papercut, causing a blood frenzy, that is only made worse when Edward throws her into a wall.  So Edward decides to break up with her and leave, taking his entire family with him and putting Bella into a depression that lasts forever.  Then she reconnects with Jacob (Lautner) and begins to seek out danger and adventure - all in a way to get glimpses of the Edward inside her head.  Something's wrong with Jacob and his tribe however, and it's only a matter of time before Bella comes out of her depression long enough to figure it out.  Also featured are the Volturi, the rulers of the vampire world, each of whom has great power.  Their leader is Aro (Sheen), and he is joined by Marcus (Christopher Heyerdahl) and Caius (Jamie Campbell Bower).  Their guards include Jane (Fanning) and her brother Alec (Cameron Bright).  Oh, and Victoria (Lefèvre) is back for revenge.

I hate the premise of this movie.  I realize that instantly makes me biased, but I hate it.  I hate that Bella is all whiny about being made into a vampire - honestly, I think I prefer vampire/human romances where the human doesn't want to be a vampire, or at least thinks about the consequences of becoming one a bit more, and isn't just all "I don't want to look older than you".  I hate that no one seems to want to point out the fact that it was James (Cam Gigandet) who gave her this idea in the first place.  Since when is taking advice from the bad guy a good idea?  I actually kind of liked that Jasper (Rathbone) goes into a blood frenzy when Bella gets a papercut as it makes sense in this world - it's kind of lame overall, but I like it - although I do question Edward's protectiveness.  Seriously, throwing her into a bookshelf is not going to help the situation.  Don't want your human girlfriend to be eaten by your vampire family? Don't throw her into a bookshelf.

What I hate most of all, however, is Bella's reaction to the breakup.  She literally goes into a depression for months on end following Edward leaving her.  I get the whole post-relationship depression, but she takes it to an extreme.  Granted, she had already basically given up her life for Edward before hand, so she didn't really have one to cling on to after he was gone... Yeah. Did not like it.  I also don't like Edward's behaviour overall.  First of all, he really seems to encourage her in her complete abandonment of her friends - something that becomes more pronounced as the series continues and the issues with Jacob become more pronounced.   I'm not saying that I disagree with Edward's feelings towards Jacob, I'm saying I don't like Edward's treatment of Bella's other friends, or Bella's treatment of them either.  As for Jacob... fuck, Jacob needs to grow up.  I get that he's a kid, and the youngest of the characters too, but his feelings and what not get annoying really fast.  There is a point when your attempts to hit on your best friend turn from heavy flirting to sexual harassment.  Remember boys, if she says "no" she's not meaning "try harder."

Thursday, 22 November 2012

Twilight (2008)

Genre: Fantasy, Romance
Rating: C-

Where to begin... These are not good movies.  I'm not entirely sure how much of that is the fault of the movies themselves and how much is the fault of the source material upon which they're based, but it's many degrees of not good all around.  I will say this, though; they do kind of get better as the series goes on.  They never achieve a good state, but they get better - or at least, up until The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1.  I can't judge Part 2 as I haven't seen it yet.

For those lucky few who have somehow managed to avoid learning what Twilight is about, here's a quick recap.  Bella Swan (Stewart) moves to Forks, Washington, the wettest place in the continental United States, to live with her dad, Charlie (Burke).  There she meets Edward Cullen (Pattinson), a mind reading vampire who she falls in love with.  Edward and his family (patriarch Carlisle Cullen (Facinelli) and his wife Esme (Reaser), the psychic Alice Cullen (Greene) and her partner Jasper Hale (Rathbone), and Emmett Cullen (Lutz) and his partner Rosalie Hale (Reed)) are all what they call vegetarians, and do not heat human blood.  Most of the movie passes by with this being the only real plot point, but then the Cullens, Hales, and Bella meet nomadic, human blood drinking vampires Laurent (Gathegi), Victoria (Lefèvre), and James (Gigandet).  James is a tracker and after a confrontation with Edward becomes infatuated with the idea of killing Bella.

Once again, what to say... Okay, so there are three major problems with these movies.  One is the general script, the second the general acting and overall casting, and the third the general make-up.  The script... oh, the script.  I'm going to say this in defense of the movie overall; you can only do so much with a movie when the source material isn't that great.  For all of Twilight the movies' flaws, a lot of them are because of the flaws of the book.  This movie did a lot to stay true to the books, for which I respect.  A few things were omitted, and in such a way that while I don't think it really disabled Twilight, it does fail to set things up for The Twilight Saga: New Moon.  You see this a lot in movies and even in TV, and it really annoys me - if you're basing something on a series of books and planning on continuing the series think about how the cuts made affect later movies or seasons.  It's easy to harp on it in Twilight, but they also do it in Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, and The Hunger Games.

The second big thing here is the cast.  The acting isn't that great, and there are even points when it seems like some of the actors are breaking character, laughing at points that in-character they shouldn't be laughing at.  This isn't really a criticism of the actors themselves, because I don't think it's the flaw of the actors.  I've watched other works of most of the actors and really enjoyed them.  There are some really great actors in this movie, they're just not properly utilized here.  The other problem is the casting in general, which is rather horrible.  It's not enough to hire a good actor, you have to hire an actor that's right for a role.  There are some people who I thought were really perfectly cast - particularly in regards to the humans - but others not so much - particularly in regards to the vampires.  I think one of the biggest problems that Robert Pattinson has in this role is that his American accent definitely isn't a good one (it does get better), making you question why they hired someone to fill in the role of an American when he couldn't do the accent.  Accents are tricky and something that movies in general, not just Twilight, tend to get wrong.  Michael Collins is actually a really good movie, despite the fact that half the cast are Americans doing bad accents, and among the other half is Alan Rickman who doesn't even try to do an Irish accent. Accents are important, people.  The casting problems in Twilight, however, go beyond just accents. There's also the fact that the vampires are all supposed to be these pale creatures (the exception being Laurent, who is black), but for the most part they hired not-exactly pale actors.  The biggest example of this the case of Nikki Reed's Rosalie.  In the books, she's described as this gorgeous woman and Nikki Reed is gorgeous.  The problem is, naturally she's neither pale nor blonde - she's a brunette with a nice tanned complexion that comes from her Jewish, Cherokee, and Italian descent.  So, what do they do?  They slap what looks like pancake makeup and a horrible wig on her.  Nikki Reed isn't the only one that they got wrong here, although I do find it interesting that she's of Cherokee descent, while Taylor Lautner, who plays the Aboriginal Jacob Black, only has "distant" Native American ancestry.  Lautner's role immediately prior to Twilight was as Eugene Levy's son in Cheaper by the Dozen 2.  Don't hire a non-Aboriginal to play an Aboriginal, it's just an insult, especially as there are plenty of Aboriginal actors out there.

But, let's go back to the pancake makeup and bad wigs.  A huge part of what makes fantasy in general so great is the special effects.  The purpose is to take you out of the real world and into this fictional one, no matter how based-in-reality it is you need to have good special effects, especially when you're expecting to be a blockbuster.  The makeup here is horrible, absolutely horrible.  There are a slew of bad wigs, bad dye jobs, and bad attempts to make the not-pale actors look pale.  It's just bad all around.  I commend Twilight for attempting to stick to the source material a lot, but in regards to the makeup this really hinders the movie.  You want to have not-pale actors?  Then give up the pale aspect of the character.  Ditto with the blond.  Don't just give them a really bad dye job.  Yes, vampires are usually pale, but this is the 21st century.  We're allowed to update the myth - Stephenie Meyer does a lot to update this myth in general, and pale skin is not important to the plot.  The worst attempt at this is in the case of Edi Gathegi, who they attempt to make pale despite his being black.  It's just all kinds of bad.  But then, so is this movie.