Author: William Goldman
Genre: Fantasy, Adventure, Romance, ComedyRating: B
"Life isn't fair. It's just fairer than death, that's all."
There’s a part of me that inherently feels bad for not giving The Princess Bride a higher rating. In the almost thirty years since it was
written it’s become a classic, and deservedly so. It’s an amazing piece of comedic fantasy and
an even more amazing piece of metafictional satire – in a way it’s a satire of
books that are satires. At the same
time, however, the story itself is rather gimmicky, the threats to the protagonists
are far too easily overcome, and William Goldman’s comments within the text can
be a bit much.
At its core The Princess Bride is
a story of true love: the beautiful Buttercup is in love with farm hand
Westley, but a series of unfortunate events pulls them apart – he, presumably
dead, is captured by the Dread Pirate Roberts and she is forcefully engaged to
marry Prince Humperdinck, the heir to the Florin throne. It’s also a story of friendship, as midway
through the series of unfortunate events Buttercup is abducted by three men who
all rather desperately need each other: the Sicilian criminal genius (Vizzini),
the Spanish master swordsman (Inigo), and the Turkish giant (Fezzik). Vizzini is a hunchback who seems to really
need to have people around in order to be amazed at his genius; Inigo needs
someone to tell him what to do, although
in his heart he longs to take vengeance on the six-fingered man who killed his
father; and Fezzik fears being alone above all other things and longs for
companionship. There’s more to it than
just this, however, as The Princess Bride
is presented as an abridged version of a much longer book by the same name,
written by S. Morgenstern. Goldman was read the story as a child by his father,
who left out all the lengthy boring bits, and upon discovering that as an adult
Goldman insisted on abridging his favourite novel with “just the good bits.” Thus, the book has a lengthy introduction
explaining Goldman’s backstory to the novel and is filled throughout with his
own commentary, telling you where he’s cut out things and making references to
the way his father told him the story the first time – and in one moment of
sheer awesomeness saying that he wrote an additional scene for the novel, but
his editor wouldn’t let him include it in the novel so if you write them they’ll
send you the three page addition. With
one of the more recent releases of the books, this request can now be made
online and an amusing letter regarding the scene will be sent to your
email. It’s actually a really good way
of continuing the book that I have to give Goldman props for.
I do enjoy the story of Princess Bride, although whenever I read the text itself I can't help but feel that Goldman spends too much time providing the back story. The story of how he decided to annotate the book is interesting and all, but it goes on for far too long, as do some of his commentary asides. This is in contrast to the development of the characters, which is actually wanting. I love Fezzik and Inigo, who Goldman does develop, but Buttercup and Westley are both kind of Mary Sues. Goldman writes a lot that is supposed to act as development for the two, but really they both seem to just get by on naturally derived talent. Buttercup is dumb as a post but amazingly beautiful and Westley is good at everything he does. Everything. The villans, however, are evil simply for the purpose of being evil.
The ending itself is a bit disappointing as well. Despite the difficulties that overwhelm the characters everything seems to just fall into place for them. They seem to win not because of any real thing that they do but because they have to. It all just seems a bit too easy, a bit too simple, a bit too contrived. It may just be that I know the story too well, and as such any suspense is removed. I'm not entirely sure.
I do enjoy the story of Princess Bride, although whenever I read the text itself I can't help but feel that Goldman spends too much time providing the back story. The story of how he decided to annotate the book is interesting and all, but it goes on for far too long, as do some of his commentary asides. This is in contrast to the development of the characters, which is actually wanting. I love Fezzik and Inigo, who Goldman does develop, but Buttercup and Westley are both kind of Mary Sues. Goldman writes a lot that is supposed to act as development for the two, but really they both seem to just get by on naturally derived talent. Buttercup is dumb as a post but amazingly beautiful and Westley is good at everything he does. Everything. The villans, however, are evil simply for the purpose of being evil.
The ending itself is a bit disappointing as well. Despite the difficulties that overwhelm the characters everything seems to just fall into place for them. They seem to win not because of any real thing that they do but because they have to. It all just seems a bit too easy, a bit too simple, a bit too contrived. It may just be that I know the story too well, and as such any suspense is removed. I'm not entirely sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment