Starring: Kevin Zegers, Liam Cunningham, Alessandra Mastronardi, Derek Jacobi, Neve Campbell, Chris Noth, Billy Carter, Ophelia Lovibond, Branwell Donaghey, Martin McCann
Creator: Ciaran Donnelly
Genre: Drama, Historical, Miniseries
Rating: C
I have really mixed feelings about this show. On the one hand, it wasn't poorly acted and a lot of elements of the plot were actually really interesting. I enjoyed the ongoing labour and religious disputes between the different levels of people building the Titanic. The struggles of protagonist Mark Muir (Zegers) are really interesting too, both in terms of his personal and work life. That having been said, however, Titanic: Blood and Steel has very little to do with the Titanic, despite being about the boat. It misrepresents history in such a way that I can't help but feel it's rather an insult to the real history here. To the real people who built the Titanic.
Titanic: Blood and Steel is not your traditional Titanic show. Rather than focus on the events of the sailing and its disastrous ending, Blood and Steel looks at the building of the ship and the people who invested in it before its maiden voyage. Here we see some of the classic figures in a Titanic story, the big names that we've come to know - Thomas Andrews (Carter), J.P. Morgan (Noth), and Lord Pirrie (Jacobi). What takes more of a focus, however, than these actual people, is the account of the very fictional Dr. Mark Muir, an Irish immigrant and American engineer who specializes in studying steel. We also see struggles of the Irish steelworkers, lead by the McCann brothers, Michael (Donaghey) and Conor (McCann), and the Italian artisans, who worked on the boat.
Once again, the thing that really got me here was how much the focus was on highly fictionalized events. Blood and Steel was at its best when it was looking at the very real problems that Titanic had to overcome in her making, and at its worst when it was focused on Mark complaining about the impurities in the steel. If this series is to be taken seriously, then it's to be believed that it was these impurities that caused the Titanic to sink and 1,502 people to die, and not the whole hitting an iceberg. In my opinion there are a lot of really interesting stories that can be told about the Titanic, both during its building and its sailing, that look a lot more at the actual history of the boat.
That being said, I don't think you need to use real people when constructing a work of historical fiction. There is that "fiction" element to it, and it can be a lot easier to use fictional characters to depict real events. James Cameron's Titanic is a great example of how this can happen, and I think the other miniseries out this year from the minds of Nigel Strafford-Clark and Julian Fellowes is another good example. Both works use a basic story that we already know in order to tell us a new story. They interweave characterizations of real people, that are largely based on documentation about them, and fictional characters, and base it around one very real event. Jack and Rose were not in themselves real, but the way their story is told gives us an idea of the real Titanic. Neither Jack nor Rose are elevated in their importance, they are very much the everyman type character (although, in the case of Rose, with a highly elevated class). The 2012 Titanic is even better in this regards because it spends a lot more time looking at people who actually were real. Blood and Steel, however, takes the name of the Titanic and a few events that occurred during its making then weaves together this very fictional story, degrading the historical figures in order to elevate the fictional ones. In the end it just kind of struck a nerve with me.
Speaking of endings, there is also the problem of Blood and Steel's actual ending. The miniseries ends where most Titanic works begin, with the boat embarking on its doomed voyage, leaving the viewer to wonder just which of the cast members who happen to be on the boat survive. While I liked the idea of some of the cast being on it, the way they did this was, in a lot of ways, really contrived and a bit forced. The speculation itself is also rather fun, in a way, but it also leaves the question open as to whether or not there was supposed to be some sort of follow up to this series - Titanic: Blood and Steel part 2. Because of the way that they did it, it really felt like they weren't ending the series.
No comments:
Post a Comment